As banks accelerate digital transformation, many are being sold on the promise of “cloud-native” core banking systems. But not all that claims to be cloud is truly built for it. According to Nelson Wootton, what’s often marketed as cloud-native is simply legacy tech dressed up for a new environment—what’s now widely called “cloud-washing.”
At first glance, these rebranded systems may appear modern. But beneath the surface, they lack the architectural flexibility and agility needed to support innovation, speed, and scale. For banks that invest heavily in these systems, the cost isn’t just financial—it’s strategic. Cloud-washing limits their ability to launch new services, adapt to customer needs, and compete in a fast-moving financial ecosystem.
Here are five key indicators your core banking provider may be selling you a legacy system in a cloud wrapper:
1. High Upfront Costs and Long Implementation Timelines
A true cloud-native core should be quick to deploy and low on setup costs. If your provider required hefty licensing fees, months-long onboarding, and expensive custom integrations, chances are you're dealing with a retrofitted legacy system. These systems are complex to deploy because they were never built for plug-and-play functionality in a cloud environment.
Modern cloud-native platforms, on the other hand, are API-first and often operate on a SaaS-like, pay-as-you-grow model. This reduces setup costs and enables faster testing and experimentation—particularly important for smaller banks aiming to stay agile.
2. No Real Self-Service Capability
Legacy cores limit self-service and customization, forcing banks into vendor-controlled update cycles and rigid development paths. If your product team can’t launch a new product quickly or make real-time updates, your system is likely built on legacy constraints.
Cloud-native cores enable banks to build, iterate, and deploy at the speed of customer demand. They’re modular, flexible, and designed to support self-service configuration and continuous delivery. If you’re stuck waiting on your vendor to roll out simple changes, that’s a red flag.
3. Scheduled Downtime for Upgrades
In a cloud-native environment, upgrades should happen in the background—without interrupting service. If system updates still require scheduled downtime or customer-facing outages, your provider may be simply hosting a legacy platform on the cloud rather than offering a truly cloud-native solution.
With microservices and API-powered infrastructure, modern core banking systems update seamlessly, enabling real-time innovation without pausing operations.
4. Missing Open APIs and Event-Driven Design
Legacy cores often lack the architecture needed for real-time insights and integration. Without open APIs or event-based systems, banks can’t unlock the full value of customer data or respond to behavioral triggers like payment patterns or balance changes.
Cloud-native systems offer real-time data streaming and event-driven architecture. This allows banks to personalize services, proactively offer products, and continuously evolve their offerings based on live data—not reports from last week.
5. Limited Scalability and Unexpected Growth Costs
A truly cloud-native core should scale with you—both technically and financially. If adding users or transaction volume results in new contracts, delays, or performance issues, your system wasn’t built for scale. Legacy systems often require manual interventions and reconfiguration to grow, stalling momentum at the worst possible time.
Cloud-native platforms are elastic. They grow as needed, automatically, and affordably. This agility is critical not just for core banking, but for integrated services like cards, payments, and lending.
Why Cloud-Native Matters Now More Than Ever
A core that was built for the cloud—not just moved there—enables banks to stay competitive, agile, and compliant. True cloud-native platforms are faster to deploy, easier to adapt, and built for a world of real-time data, embedded finance, and evolving customer expectations.
Banks looking to modernize should demand proof from vendors: Is the architecture microservices-based? Are upgrades seamless? Is real-time data accessible via open APIs? Can the platform scale instantly without renegotiating contracts?
The future of banking is composable, real-time, and driven by digital experiences. Only true cloud-native cores can meet that future head-on. Don’t settle for a legacy system in cloud clothing.
Ask ChatGPT